Thailand’s pro-democracy movement suffered a significant setback recently when Pita Limjaroenrat, leader of the Move Forward Party, failed to secure the necessary votes to become the country’s next Prime Minister. Despite winning the most votes in Thailand’s election in May, Pita’s bid was rejected by an unelected senate in the Thai parliament. This blow to the pro-democracy movement raises concerns about the prospects of change in a country that has been ruled by a military-backed government for the past nine years.
The Move Forward Party had built its campaign on promises of progressive reforms, including the legalization of same-sex marriage and a push to reform stringent royal defamation laws. These policies garnered widespread public support and reflected growing frustration with the conservative establishment in Thailand. However, during the first round of voting, Pita fell short of the 375 votes necessary for confirmation as Prime Minister. With only 13 of the appointed senators supporting him, Pita mustered a total of just 324 votes in his favor.
The outcome of the vote was predictable, given Thailand’s rigged, faux-democratic system, according to experts. The presence of electoral and judicial barriers that prevent a smooth transition of power has perpetuated this undemocratic environment. Until such barriers are removed, similar outcomes will persist. Nevertheless, the saga is not yet over, with another round of voting scheduled for July 19, providing a slim chance for Pita to clinch the top job.
During the pre-vote debate, the Move Forward Party’s opposition to Thailand’s royal defamation laws, known as lese-majeste, took center stage. It marked a rare occasion where the monarchy was explicitly discussed in parliament. Move Forward’s calls to amend Section 112, the controversial lese-majeste law, gained strong popular support. However, it also became the target of a petition accepted by the Constitutional Court, claiming that the proposed amendments violated the constitution.
Thailand’s general election in May provided hope for a shift towards democracy, with opposition parties like Move Forward and Pheu Thai sweeping the majority of seats. However, the entrenched political order has stacked the odds against Pita and the pro-democracy movement. While forming an eight-party coalition, Move Forward was unable to gather enough support to form a government, leaving Pita dependent on votes from senators and MPs outside the coalition alliance.
Following Thursday’s session, further voting rounds are expected, potentially accompanied by new contenders and shifts in coalition alliances. Pita remains determined to gather more support for the upcoming vote, and the Move Forward Party maintains its commitment to amending the lese-majeste law. Pending court rulings on Pita’s case and Move Forward’s defense against dissolution leave room for uncertain outcomes. Failure to secure the prime minister position could spark mass protests across the country, highlighting the frustration and disillusionment among those seeking political reforms.
Thailand’s pro-democracy movement faces an uphill battle as it navigates a rigged political system that has hampered genuine change. Despite setbacks, the determination and aspirations of the public are likely to fuel demands for political reforms. The uncertainty surrounding Thailand’s future underscores the urgent need for electoral and judicial reforms to restore public trust in the democratic process.
The post “Uncertainty and Setbacks: Thailand’s Pro-Democracy Movement Struggles for Change” first appeared on the European News Global.
