July 11, 2023 at 03:13AM
Technology giants are facing growing backlash as they actively participate in shaping a new trade deal between the United States, Australia, South Korea, and other members of the Indo-Pacific region. As these negotiations account for 40% of global economic output, activists have raised concerns about the role of corporations in drafting trade agreements.
Some fear that these tech companies may exploit the new pact to circumvent domestic regulation and enforcement of antitrust laws.
Alarmed by the potential influence of corporations in the drafting process, activists have launched a campaign to limit their involvement, particularly in writing the digital chapter of the trade agreement. This campaign has gained momentum as trade negotiators gather for the fourth round of negotiations in Busan, South Korea.
Opponents argue that trade negotiations should prioritize fair trade practices, rather than allowing tech giants to further their own interests through anti-competitive behavior.
Tech companies have actively engaged in discussions with government officials, with 34 out of 40 stakeholders who gave presentations representing corporations or tech-related groups. Some critics argue that these companies are seeking special exemptions within the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) to protect their market dominance.
The presence of tech industry-hosted events and lobbying efforts during negotiation rounds raises concerns about undue influence in the process.
Senator Elizabeth Warren has expressed apprehension that the IPEF may serve as a means for the tech industry to evade effective regulations both in the United States and other countries. However, US Trade Representative Katherine Tai has emphasized the need to prioritize workers’ interests and ensure a worker-centered trade policy.
The final agreement, according to Tai’s spokesperson, will strive to align with President Biden’s vision.
The main point of contention revolves around the digital trade chapter within the IPEF, which several stakeholders argue should include provisions similar to those found in the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Some technology lobbyists are advocating for stronger provisions or comparable measures that protect American companies.
They argue that robust digital rules benefit businesses beyond just the technology sector, fostering a regulatory environment that supports fair competition globally.
The IPEF aims to counter China’s trade influence in Asia and serves as a replacement for the Trans-Pacific Partnership that the US withdrew from during the Trump administration. Negotiations have been ongoing for approximately six months, and the fourth round is scheduled to take place in Busan, South Korea.
As the Indo-Pacific trade negotiations progress, the issue of tech giants’ influence continues to provoke concern and debate. While technology companies stress the importance of protecting industries beyond their own, critics argue for stricter regulations and fair competition practices.
Amidst these competing interests, trade negotiators must strike a balance that addresses the concerns of both big corporations and other stakeholders to ensure a mutually beneficial trade agreement for all participating nations.
The post “Technology Giants Under Fire for Influencing Indo-Pacific Trade Deal” first appeared on the European News Global.
European News Global 